Research Analysis

30/11/26

Research Analysis

When it comes to evaluating my sources I was originally using the RAVEN technique as during my EPQ on evaluating sources I thought this would be the technique I worked with best. However, when it came to evaluating my sources I was putting it off and starting to fall behind on my Gannt chart and I believed this was due to me not having a clear process as I was originally using a table with the RAVEN technique but have since switch to separate documents with each source with a modified process of both the RAVEN and CRAAP test. This is because I found it easier to understand what to do and this allowed me to get back on track with my Gantt chart.

 Source name: 

Source Type: 

Link: 

Citation: 

Author/Publishing House: 

Date Published and Location: 

Summary: 

Credibility: (evaluate scholar for reliability and expertise (and consider if it was a firsthand experience and knowledge in the subject and potential personal bias in the topic)) 

Relevance:(how useful is it to my article and does it effectively support my argument) 

Accuracy:(is the information accurate with evidence, do the references back it up and is it accurate when cross references to more reliable sources) 

Neutrality:(is the source bias in any way and what is the purpose and intent of the source) 

Rating:  /10